25 Comments on “Level 5 Subwoofer FLEX w/ 2 Really Good Bass Songs For LOUD Car Audio – DC’s Biggest & Best Sub Ever”

• aberry9475

  

  4 July, 2011, 16:45

  i like how it just shakes the door panels like theyre paper haha
• astoesz4

  

  4 July, 2011, 17:04

  yeeeeaa buudddy nice subs 18″??
• Mrgodisspeaking

  

  4 July, 2011, 17:35

  this guy knows how intake thee bass
• MrM00nPIE

  

  4 July, 2011, 18:11

  I love how people are complaining about how there isn’t enough flex. Just to let you all know flex in speakers is not good, it doesn’t hurt the speakers, but at that point its very inefficient because that flex is actually not making any sound. I have 4 18 inch Cerwin Vegas LE-36 and the flex in those is minimal and the sounds quality is 100 times better and just as loud
• s1172062

  

  4 July, 2011, 19:07

  what song is playing
• ford302redneck

  

  4 July, 2011, 19:42

  @funkmasterflip

  I don’t know much about why camera’s give off that wavey effect or whatever you want to call it. I assumed it has something to do with frame rate. Go look at my videos, they look way closer to what a human eye see’s. And that’s only a $200 dollar digital camera.
• funkmasterflip

  

  4 July, 2011, 20:21

  @ford302redneck Youtube doesn’t go over 30FPS. Not all $100 camera has the capabilities of a $3k camera.
• thetommantom

  

  4 July, 2011, 20:28

  so i hear XLs are louder. . . . .
• ford302redneck

  

  4 July, 2011, 21:24

  @EXOabigdeal

  Part 2.

  I’m not trying to be a “hater” or “troll” or whatever people are called these days.

  Just trying to give feedback, in what I think that could make your videos better. Your videos have a good impact on the internet car audio world, and anything that helps you, helps everybody that loves this “hobby” or whatever it is to you(or anybody else).
• ford302redneck

  

  4 July, 2011, 21:28

  @EXOabigdeal

  Part 1

  Only thing I ever tried to do was give some constructive crictism. This is really your only downfall to your videos. You make some awesome videos, but in my opinion, it isn’t all it could be with the low FPS rate(I assume this is the problem).

  But seeing a sub, top of the cone going out, and the bottom going in, then visa versa, isn’t really showing what they sub is actually doing.
• ford302redneck

  

  4 July, 2011, 21:54

  @DBbyDesign

  Dude, since when does a camera with a good FPS rate cost “a couple thousand dollars”?

  I have a 10MP Digital camera, I’m not even sure of the FPS rate, that cost ~$200, and it does a very good job of recreating flex/excursion as it actually is seen with the naked eye.

  Sure, it isn’t perfect, but for price vs performance, it does the job well.
• DBbyDesign

  

  4 July, 2011, 22:01

  @ford302redneck i understand what your trying to say. but we would all rather see EXO get some new soundstream 18″s and some more amps ranther then spending a couple thousand on a camera that will pickup a bit more flex. his videos are more then clear enough to portray the intenseness in alot of these cars and his editing is amazing to watch.
• Numba1playa1804

  

  4 July, 2011, 22:37

  System is good but the interior and shit is trashy as hell. I know the system fucks alot of the shit up but damn fix the shit.
• hunt794

  

  4 July, 2011, 22:57

  Steve Meade should look into this camera.
• pattman96

  

  4 July, 2011, 23:18

  i got 2 of thoose hahahahaaaaaa
• ford302redneck

  

  4 July, 2011, 23:32

  @blankpaper66

  Dude, you must don’t know much about cameras. Yes, some cameras are 30fps and some are 60fps, but they make them up to at least 1000fps. So your saying a high speed camera, which will record a bullet being shot from a gun will not accurately pick up sub movement or flex?

  I’m not saying that you have to have 1000+fps, to record these types of videos.
• backinbass

  

  4 July, 2011, 23:58

  Can anyone tell me what song @ 1:13 – 1:46?
  thnx!
• blankpaper66

  

  5 July, 2011, 0:45

  @ford302redneck Camera’s don’t and probably won’t for a long time record at a high enough frame rate to accurately capture flexing from subwoofers like that.

  The reason they look like waves, is because the camer only records (I fot get. . was it at 30 or 60) fps, which is no where neas fast enough to capture flexing properly as the doors as an example, are moving a lot faster than your average camera can capture.
• Xlay16

  

  5 July, 2011, 0:58

  whats the first song
• greenesthaze

  

  5 July, 2011, 1:51

  you know they make a lvl 6 18”, so i wouldn’t consider this the biggest sub they make. . . just saying.
  crazy window flex though!!
• ford302redneck

  

  5 July, 2011, 2:38

  @BakermanINC

  Its not that you need the best possible camera to shoot decently quality videos.

  I just meant if your going to shoot these types of videos, their is kind of a mandatory quality level or they don’t look as good as they should.
• ford302redneck

  

  5 July, 2011, 3:28

  @fredtflail 

  You actually seem like the Troll talking shit about irrelavent things. You see the Ford302 part right? Which doesn’t have plastic gears, so why even bring it up? You act like every motor company is perfect but Ford. Which is hardly the case, they all have flaws and had piss poor designs.

  So how about you do everybody a favor and stop “trolling”.
• fredtflail

  

  5 July, 2011, 4:20

  @ford302redneck

  Your just a fucking troll looking to talk shit. Don’t u have a plastic oil pump gear or a plastic timing gear to fix on your stupid Ford? Instead of talking shit about the way a camera picks up the way a subwoofer moves.
• ThatDudeStylust

  

  5 July, 2011, 4:25

  every time i watch your vids, it makes me wanna poop. GOOD JOB!
• BakermanINC

  

  5 July, 2011, 4:59

  @EXOabigdeal Not unless you got a really expensive slo mo camera. . . like 1000+fps. . . but thats alot of money.